DocketXDocketX vs Ivo
We are not going to invent a feature table about someone else's product. Vendors change pricing and capabilities constantly, and a comparison built on guesses is worth nothing to you and unfair to them. Instead: here are the eight questions that actually separate legal AI you can file from legal AI that merely sounds confident. Our answers are stated precisely and are checkable. Put the same questions to Ivo and compare the answers you get.
Different jobs, honestly stated
What each one actually does
Ivo is an AI contract-review platform for in-house teams: it applies your company's playbooks to incoming contracts, proposes redlines inside Word, and manages that negotiation workflow. By its own materials and press coverage it serves in-house legal at companies like Uber, Shopify and Canva, raised a $55M Series B in January 2026 (Blackbird; ~$75M total raised), and third-party reviews report flat per-user annual pricing. Those are Ivo's claims and reporters' figures, not ours; verify them with Ivo.
DocketX does a different job: it grounds AI answers in the law itself. That means retrieval over real statutes, court rules and case law, with every citation verified against 18,123,788 real citations before you see it, and an audit trail per answer. Ivo reviews your paper against your playbook; DocketX answers what the law actually says, and proves it.
The overlap question a buyer should ask: when a contract review turns on a question of law (is this clause enforceable in Texas, what does the statute require, has a court construed this language), what does each tool do? Ours looks the law up and shows its work. Ask Ivo the same question. Many teams will sensibly run both: playbook automation on the paper, a verification layer on the law.
| The question | DocketX answer | Their answer |
|---|---|---|
| Does it verify that every citation exists, before you see the answer? | Yes. Every citation is looked up in 18,123,788 citations across 989 reporters; anything unverifiable is removed from the answer and disclosed. | Ask Ivo |
| What is the measured hallucination rate, on what test? | Zero unverifiable citations survived across 348 adversarial and real answers on three models, measured on the production system. | Ask Ivo |
| Exactly what law does it hold, and as of when? | 615,391 Texas appellate decisions through June 2026, 122,681 Texas statute sections, 45,660 U.S. Supreme Court opinion documents, 370 county local rules, 2,008 court rules verbatim. Machine-readable at docketrouter.ai/api/v1/jurisdictions. | Ask Ivo |
| What does it NOT cover? | Federal district and circuit opinions, most states' case law (Texas deepest, Washington next), treatises, and citator history. We publish the gaps. | Ask Ivo |
| Can you audit an individual answer afterward? | Yes, per request: what was retrieved, what was checked, what was removed, retrievable by request id. | Ask Ivo |
| Can it run on your own hardware? | Yes, private-pod keys restrict to in-house models on infrastructure you control, with bring-your-own-key support. | Ask Ivo |
| What does it cost, exactly? | $0.01 per retrieval query plus model usage at cost, prepaid, no seats, no annual minimum. Pricing is published. | Ask Ivo |
| Is the answer's source a document you can open? | Yes, every cited authority links to the record, and rule text is held word for word. | Ask Ivo |
Test it yourself, free
The ten-minute evaluation
Ask any legal AI a narrow question in your jurisdiction, then verify every citation it produced against the published reporters before you rely on it. Whatever tool you end up buying, do this before you rely on it. It is the single test that catches the failure that costs the most.
If you want ours
Start without talking to anyone
Ivo is a product of its respective owner and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or a partner of DocketX; names are used for identification and comparison only. We make no claims about their features, pricing or accuracy, ask them directly. Our own figures are counted from our live library and independently checkable through our public API. Not legal advice.